<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatic Forex Crusher Review &#8211; Will It Be Your Automatic Forex Crusher Machine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forex-trading-systems-4-you.com/2009/05/automatic-forex-crusher-review-will-it-be-your-automatic-forex-crusher-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forex-trading-systems-4-you.com/2009/05/automatic-forex-crusher-review-will-it-be-your-automatic-forex-crusher-machine/</link>
	<description>Helping You Make Money With Forex Robots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Forex Trading Systems 4 You</title>
		<link>http://forex-trading-systems-4-you.com/2009/05/automatic-forex-crusher-review-will-it-be-your-automatic-forex-crusher-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Forex Trading Systems 4 You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 11:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forex-trading-systems-4-you.com/?p=781#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>Hey Jakob,

Apologies for not putting a link to the source in.

Granted, the backtest is pretty terrible, but the forward testing is pretty good. My source was this site - http://www.4xproject.com/lang/en-us/robot-review/automatic-forex-crusher/  .

My comment about it being &quot;better than Forex MegaDroid &amp; FapTurbo combined&quot; was based on this data (which has changed a little since I posted but still appears to hold true) :

http://www.4xproject.com/ea-demo-tests/

As far as I know this site is one of the more independent test ones out there.

Hope that helps!

Ant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jakob,</p>
<p>Apologies for not putting a link to the source in.</p>
<p>Granted, the backtest is pretty terrible, but the forward testing is pretty good. My source was this site &#8211; <a href="http://www.4xproject.com/lang/en-us/robot-review/automatic-forex-crusher/" rel="nofollow">http://www.4xproject.com/lang/en-us/robot-review/automatic-forex-crusher/</a>  .</p>
<p>My comment about it being &#8220;better than Forex MegaDroid &#038; FapTurbo combined&#8221; was based on this data (which has changed a little since I posted but still appears to hold true) :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.4xproject.com/ea-demo-tests/" rel="nofollow">http://www.4xproject.com/ea-demo-tests/</a></p>
<p>As far as I know this site is one of the more independent test ones out there.</p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
<p>Ant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://forex-trading-systems-4-you.com/2009/05/automatic-forex-crusher-review-will-it-be-your-automatic-forex-crusher-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forex-trading-systems-4-you.com/?p=781#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Why is Automatic Forex Crusher better than Fapturbo and ForexMegadroid and therefore number 1 fore live accounts? Independant results?

Run some backtests for the years 2007 and 2006. DISASTER....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Automatic Forex Crusher better than Fapturbo and ForexMegadroid and therefore number 1 fore live accounts? Independant results?</p>
<p>Run some backtests for the years 2007 and 2006. DISASTER&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
